MISIC Training

MISIC Curriculum

HOME
1. MISIC CURRICULUM
*1.1 MISIC and Local Crosswalk
*1.2 MISIC and Local Mapping
*1.3 Scope and Sequence
2. MAP REPORTS
*2.1 Scavenger Hunt
*2.2 Dynamic Reporting Suite
*2.3 Teacher Reports
*2.4 Class by RIT Reports
3. DES CARTES & INSTRUCTION
*3.1 Des Cartes Introduction
*3.2 Planning
*3.3 MISIC Ladders
4. LEXILES
*4.1 Scavenger Hunt
*4.2 Planning Guides
*4.3 Tiered Resources Lists
*4.4 Lexile Website Resources
*4.5 Comparing Scales
5. COMMUNICATION
*5.1 Parent Notification
*5.2 Student Information
*5.3 Des Cartes Framework
*5.4 Parent-Teacher Conferences
6. SYSTEM SUPPORTS
*6.1 Coordinator and Administrator Handbook
*6.2 Implementation Checklist
*6.3 Testing Schedules
*6.4 Roles and Responsibilities Checklist
7. DISTRICT LEADERSHIP TEAMS
*7.1 Evaluating MAP Data
*7.2 District Summary Reports
*7.3 Student Growth Summary Report
8. STUDENT GOAL SETTING
*8.1 Class Roster Reports
*8.2 Goal Setting
*8.3 Performance Standards
9. MAP DATA AND IEP GOALS
*9.1 Group Comparisons
*9.2 Growth Comparisons
*9.3 Goal Strand Comparisons
*9.4 Des Cartes Learning Continuum Comparisons

MISIC and Local Crosswalk

Individual benchmarks in the MISIC document and your local set can differ in four ways (match in content and cognitive complexity but not in grade level, currently no local benchmark is written but it is taught, a MISIC benchmark might not be taught locally, or it could be in the local set but not in the MISIC set), or they could match in content and cognitive complexity as well as grade level.

One way to get a handle on the degree of difference is to record how they differ. The attachment lists the five categories of comparing benchmarks, you might choose to color code or create another system for record keeping.

This activity can be valuable when a district is deciding whether or not they will join MISIC, when deciding if they will adopt the MISIC curriculum or correlate local benchmarks with MISIC while continuing to teach the local benchmarks, or when a district is deciding how much support and/or professional development time teachers will require to guarantee their curriculum.

This activity is best for teachers who are looking at the MISIC curriculum for the first time. A suggested format for this assignment might be working within grade spans for the first review (K-2, 3-5, 6-8, and 9-12), then articulating their findings in a K-12 group.

Choices may need to be made when dealing with mismatched benchmarks. Any benchmarks that are not a "perfect" match should be discussed within the department. The group may need to come to consensus on how to remedy grade level mismatches or how many local benchmarks they would add to the MISIC set, for example.

Some discussion questions that may aid a group are given here. You may consider working through the answers to these questions before the review of benchmarks and local curriculum is done.


-How will we deal with benchmarks not in "perfect" alignment?
-How do we know we're teaching a benchmark at the appropriate cognitive complexity?
-Will we change entirely to the MISIC standards and benchmarks, will we create a document to reference our local standards and benchmarks to those of MISIC, or will we create a new document merging both?

Crosswalk Color Coding Ideas

Mid-Iowa School Improvement Consortium
PO Box 368, 715 Main Street, Jewell, IA 50130
Office phone: 515-827-9010
Sue's cell: 515-290-8500
Jamie's cell: 615-804-1179